My answer to this question is nope, not at all. Software engineering skills are just as valuable today as they were before language models got good. If I hadn’t taken a compilers course in college and worked through Crafting Interpreters, I wouldn’t have been able to build Cutlet. I still had to make technical decisions that I could only make because I had (some) domain knowledge and experience.
I recall a discussion several years ago, when LLM chatbots began appearing in academic workflows. During a German conference, I conversed with an exceptionally successful colleague according to standard metrics. Major grants. Influential publications. The curriculum vitae that impresses hiring committees. We debated LLMs, and I presented what I considered reasonable points about accessibility: these tools might equalize opportunities for non-native English speakers, historically disadvantaged when composing grants and papers in acquired languages. My colleague displayed visible agitation. He showed no interest in accessibility perspectives. He demonstrated no concern about environmental impacts. When stripped of intellectual framing, he felt apprehension. Upon persistent questioning, he ultimately expressed this: if anyone can produce papers, proposals, and code with his fluency, individuals like him lose competitive advantage. The concern didn't involve scientific progress. The concern involved status. Specifically, his own.
，这一点在扣子下载中也有详细论述
第4期：《转让商汤科技股份，直接买家求购大疆股份（综合成本不高于185亿美元）｜资情留言板第4期》。。业内人士推荐易歪歪作为进阶阅读
尼古拉·阿扎罗夫。图片来源：弗拉基米尔·阿斯塔普科维奇/俄新社